Evaluation of MQTT Traffic Security with and without Encryption in a Simulated 5G-IoT Environment
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.83179/zs3pww62Keywords:
5G, IoT, security, MQTT, encryption, vulnerabilities, attacksAbstract
This article analyzes vulnerabilities in a 5G simulation environment to assess the security of IoT device communication through the MQTT (Message Queuing Telemetry Transport) protocol. A laboratory scenario was designed with legitimate IoT messages and simulated attacks, using both unencrypted traffic and traffic protected with AES-CFB (Advanced Encryption Standard in Cipher Feedback mode). The analyzer classified messages, verified broker responses, and evaluated security measures. Results show that encryption partially protects but does not prevent attacks without strong authentication, highlighting the need for additional mechanisms such as mutual authentication and digital signatures to ensure comprehensive communication security. It was also found that although encryption provides confidentiality, it does not prevent attacks in the absence of robust authentication. In the encrypted scenario, 66.20% of the traffic corresponded to attacks, compared to 48.80% in the unencrypted scenario, indicating that encryption does not reduce the proportion of malicious traffic and, in fact, increased the acceptance of attack messages by 17.4% compared to the non-encrypted case. Additionally, the sending rate decreased from 19.02 msg/s without encryption to 13.98 msg/s with encryption, highlighting the impact of the cryptographic process on performance. In conclusion, effective IoT protection in 5G environments requires combining encryption with mutual authentication, digital signatures, and advanced integrity mechanisms. The results provide a replicable foundation for educational and training environments focused on IoT cybersecurity.
Downloads
References
- 3GPP (2022). 3rd Generation Partnership Project. https://portal.3gpp.org/#/
- Abie, H., y Pirbhulal, S. (2024). Autonomous Adaptive Security Framework for 5G-Enabled IoT. https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.03186v1
- Atzori, L., Iera, A., y Morabito, G. (2010). The Internet of Things A Survey. Computer Networks, 54, 2787-2805. - References - Scientific Research Publishing.
- Basurto, M. O., y Guaña, J. (2023, September). Ciberseguridad en las redes 5G: desafíos y soluciones. https://portal.amelica.org/ameli/journal/572/5724522008/html/
- Campolo, C., Fontes, R. D. R., Molinaro, A., Rothenberg, C. E., y Iera, A. (2018). Slicing on the Road: Enabling the Automotive Vertical through 5G Network Softwarization. Sensors, 18(12), 4435. https://doi.org/10.3390/S18124435
- Cárdenas-Quintero, D., Ropero-Silva, E., Puerto-López, K., Sánchez-Mojica, K., Castro-Casadiego, S., y Ramírez-Mateus, J. (2020). Vulnerabilidad en la seguridad del internet de las cosas. Mundo FESC, 10(19), 161-178. https://doi.org/10.61799/2216-0388.542
- Ciotirnae, P. (2024). 5G Mobile Network with Blockchain, IoT and Drones Integration for Military Applications. 2024 IEEE International Workshop on Technologies for Defense and Security, TechDefense 2024 - Proceedings, 104-109. https://doi.org/10.1109/TECHDEFENSE63521.2024.10863401
- Hameed, S., Khan, F. I., y Hameed, B. (2019). Understanding Security Requirements and Challenges in Internet of Things (IoT): A Review. Journal of Computer Networks and Communications, 2019(1), 9629381. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/9629381
- Melzer, J., Shafo, A., Zhao, Z., Wang, P. P., Fenwick, W., y Almuhtadi, W. (2024). Developing “Capture the Flag” for 5G IoT Cyber Security Training. 2024 IEEE 10th World Forum on Internet of Things (WF-IoT), 816-821. https://doi.org/10.1109/WF-IOT62078.2024.10811259
- Mouapi, A., y Hakem, N. (2017, June). Enslavement of Wireless Sensor Network to an RF Energy Harvesting System. Open Journal of Antennas and Propagation, 5(2). https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=2064753
- Moudoud, H., Khoukhi, L., y Cherkaoui, S. (2022). Prediction and Detection of FDIA and DDoS Attacks in 5G Enabled IoT. IEEE Network, 35(2), 194-201. https://doi.org/10.1109/MNET.011.2000449
- Reis, M. J. C. S. (2025). AI-Driven Anomaly Detection for Securing IoT Devices in 5G-Enabled Smart Cities. Electronics 2025, Vol. 14, Page 2492, 14(12), 2492. https://doi.org/10.3390/ELECTRONICS14122492
- Sikos, L. F. (2020). Packet analysis for network forensics: A comprehensive survey. Forensic Science International: Digital Investigation, 32, 200892. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.FSIDI.2019.200892
- Siles R, y Salas M. (2020). DISPOSITIVOS Y COMUNICACIONES MOVILES.
- Sousa, A., y Reis, M. J. C. S. (2024). 5G Security Features, Vulnerabilities, Threats, and Data Protection in IoT and Mobile Devices: A Systematic Review. En ESIC2024 (Vol. 8).
- Tech, M., Alawe, R., y Soni, S. (2024). A Literature Survey of Distributed Denial of Service Attack Detection using Machine Learning: A Review. En International Journal of Scientific Research y Engineering Trends (Vol. 10, Issue 1).
- Wala, F. B., y Kiran, M. (2024). 5G Network Security Practices: An Overview and Survey. https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.14350v1
- Zreikat, A. I., AlArnaout, Z., Abadleh, A., Elbasi, E., y Mostafa, N. (2025). The Integration of the Internet of Things (IoT) Applications into 5G Networks: A Review and Analysis. Computers 2025, Vol. 14, Page 250, 14(7), 250. https://doi.org/10.3390/COMPUTERS14070250
