Methodology for performance verification of fixed water spray systems during the design stage for the petrochemical industry
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.83179/8yjv8p26Keywords:
water spray, fire protection, petrochemical industry, gas dispersion, thermal radiation, hydraulic system design, verification methodologyAbstract
Water spray systems used for fire protection in the petrochemical industry are commonly designed based on prescriptive criteria established by international standards such as NFPA 15 and API 2030, which do not include verification of actual performance under specific fire or gas-release scenarios. This limitation may result in oversized systems or, in some cases, systems that comply with applicable regulations but prove ineffective under actual operating conditions. This article proposes a methodology for verifying the performance of water spray systems during the design stage, aimed at assessing their capacity to absorb thermal radiation and disperse clouds of flammable or toxic gases. The methodology integrates physical models validated in the literature—including Sahuquillo (2020), Buchlin (1994), Rana (2008), Pasquill-Gifford, and Cheung (2009)—and is structured into two calculation modules: equipment cooling (criteria C1–C5) and gas dispersion (criteria D2–D8). The results show that regulatory compliance is necessary but not sufficient condition for ensuring system effectiveness. The methodology makes it possible to identify performance flaws that are not apparent through traditional approaches and provides a practical, auditable tool applicable in the Colombian professional context without requiring specialized software.
Downloads
References
- American Petroleum Institute (2008). API RP 521: Guide for Pressure-Relieving and Depressuring Systems (5.ª ed.). API.
- American Petroleum Institute (2015). API Publication 2030: Application of Fixed Water Spray Systems for Fire Protection in the Petroleum Industry (4.ª ed.). API.
- Barcova, K., y Balner, D. (2017). Attenuation of Thermal Radiation Through Water Mist. Process Safety Progress, 37(1).
- Buchlin, J. M. (1994). Mitigation of Problem Clouds. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 7(2), 167-174.
- Center of Chemical Process Safety (2010). Guidelines for Fire Protection in Chemical, Petrochemical and Hydrocarbon Processing Facilities. AICHE CCPS.
- Cheung, W. (2009). Radiation Blockage of Water Curtains. International Journal on Engineering Performance-Based Fire Codes, 7(2), 167-174.
- Dandrieux, A., y Dusserre, G. (2003). The DVS Model: A New Concept for Heavy Gas Dispersion by Water Curtain. Environmental Modelling & Software, 18, 253-259.
- Fitzpatrick, J. M. (1983). Air Entrainment by Water Sprays: Strategies for Application to the Dispersion of Gas Plumes. Journal of Occupational Accidents, 5, 121-133.
- National Fire Protection Association (2019). NFPA 15: Standard for Water Spray Fixed Systems for Fire Protection. NFPA.
- National Fire Protection Association (2022). NFPA 1: Fire Code. NFPA.
- Rana, M. A., y Cormier, B. R. (2008, 28 de octubre). Experimental Study of Effective Spray Curtain Application in Dispensing Liquefied Natural Gas Vapor Clouds. Wiley Interscience.
- Sahuquillo, A. (2020a). Dispersión de fugas de gases y absorción de radiación de un incendio mediante agua pulverizada y cortinas de agua.
- Sahuquillo, A. (2020b). Estimación de la radiación absorbida por los sistemas de agua pulverizada que protegen los tanques de combustible.
